Reddick v. United States Of America

Reddick v. United States Of America

Petitioner:	Qaaid Reddick
Respondent:	United States Of America
Case Number:	2:2017cv00087
Filed:	July 24, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Brunswick Office
County:	Glynn
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 26, 2019	Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Reddick's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion 1 , DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENIES Reddick in forma pauperis on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/26/2019. (ca)
November 1, 2019	Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DENY Reddick's 1 Motion, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case, and DENY Reddick in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2019). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 11/1/2019. (csr)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 26, 2019

Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DENIES Reddick's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion 1 , DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENIES Reddick in forma pauperis on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 11/26/2019. (ca)

November 1, 2019

Filing 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DENY Reddick's 1 Motion, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and CLOSE this case, and DENY Reddick in forma pauperis status on appeal and a Certificate of Appealability. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/15/2019). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 11/1/2019. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reddick v. United States Of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Qaaid Reddick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States Of America
Represented By:	R. Brian Tanner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?