United States Of America v. $80,891.25 in U.S. Currency
| United States Of America |
| $80,891.25 in U.S. Currency |
| United States Of America |
| Luis D. Davila-Tosado |
| Luis D. Davila-Tosado |
| 4:2011cv00183 |
| July 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| G. R. Smith |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER that the Court orders the return of the $80,891.25 to Davila-Tosado. The Court further awards Davila-Tosado $3,251.05 in attorneys' fees and costs. The Court also awards Davila-Tosado $2,681.68 in pre-judgment interest and $.50 in post-judgment interest. The total amount thus awarded to Davila-Tosado, including the returned property, is $86,824.48. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/19/12. (bcw)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; granting 11 Motion for Return of Property; granting 18 Motion. Davila-Tosado is ordered to submit a brief on the issue of the damages within seven days of this Order. The government is ordered to submit its response within seven days of Davila-Tosado's filing. The Court will not accept any replies. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 12/19/2011. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
