Leaks et al v. Target Corporation
| Latisha Leaks and Benjamin Leaks |
| Target Corporation |
| 4:2014cv00106 |
| May 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER APPROVING re 49 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Latisha Leaks. This action is dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/21/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER terminating 33 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 35 Motion to Quash; denying 38 Motion. The parties have an additional 30 days from the date of this Order to file dispositive motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/6/15. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 29 Motion ; granting 26 Motion to Compel. The Court will allow the parties 30 additional days to complete discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/30/15. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Compel; granting 15 Motion for Protective Order; denying 18 Motion to Compel. Target is only required to produce the safety policies applicable for the three years preceding the incident. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 10/28/14. (wwp) Modified on 10/28/2014 (wwp).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
