Owens v. Prince et al
| Dantonius M. Owens |
| Barbara Prince, Glendon Berddell, Lawrence Manker and Jack Koon |
| 4:2014cv00212 |
| September 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER ADOPTING the 32 Report and Recommendations dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/19/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER directing all parties to be served re 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Dantonius M. Owens, 27 MOTION to Stay filed by Lawrence Manker, Glendora Birddell, Jack Koon, Barbara Prince. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 7/29/2016. (loh)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER directing the defendants to file answers or dispositive motions no later than 14 days from the date this Order is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/26/16. (bcw)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to forward a copy of plaintiff's amended complaint and this Order to the Marshal for service upon all defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/2/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER directing all parties to be served re 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Dantonius M. Owens. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/14/2015. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
