Foreman v. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al
| Najee Foreman |
| Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Walgreen Co., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Claxton-Graves, Inc. and John Does 1-3 |
| 4:2017cv00089 |
| May 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 03/20/2019. (evk)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting 50 Motion to Substitute Party. Patricia Bowers added. Najee Foreman terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 01/15/2019. (evk)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER VACATING re 48 Pretrial Order. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 08/06/2018. (evs)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against Walgreen Co. without prejudice with each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 06/13/2018. (evs) Modified on 6/14/2018 (jrb).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 44 Joint Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 06/05/2018. (evs)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 23 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/12/17. (jlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
