Bell et al v. Welcher et al
| Taurus Myers, Dominique Daniels, Vodie Nathaniel Bell, Jr., Leevonny Walker, Jr., Rohkee Singleton, Timone Fraizer, Arkeem Burggess and Rodrick Richardson |
| Captain Blanton, Major Boyles, Captain B. Ervin, Sheriff John Welcher, Nurse Jackie Harned, Corpral Spencer, Captain Hill and Lt. Jones |
| 4:2020cv00302 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Deficiency. For Judge Stan Baker cases, the Plaintiff statement regarding referral was not returned within 14 days. (Compliance due by 1/1/2021.) (MG) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 12/21/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/7/2020. (loh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 12/18/2020. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 12/04/2020. (Attachments: #1 Statement) (JH)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vodie Nathaniel Bell, Jr. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (JH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Vodie Nathaniel Bell, Jr. (JH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
