Sweeney v. Estes et al
| Steven Sweeney |
| David Estes and United States Of America |
| 4:2021cv00233 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Order terminating the filing of #3 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. The parties are directed to confer in accordance with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and to submit a renewed report following Plaintiff's service of the pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 09/9/2021. (jlh) (jlh).
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (JH) |
| Filing 3 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (maa) |
|
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 8/17/2021. (csr)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Estes and the United States of America, filed by Steven Sweeney. $402.00 Filing Fee Paid - Receipt Number: SAV039683. (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/18/2021: #1 Correct Attachment) (csr). |
| Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
