Palmore v. Jackson
Edward Palmore |
Donald R. Jackson, Mrs. Johnson, Tucker, Knowles, Chambers and Keith Wilson |
5:2010cv00040 |
April 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Waycross Office |
Coffee |
Lisa G. Wood |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 161 ORDER ADOPTING the 154 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Defendants' 125 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff's 120 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed, w ithout prejudice, due to his failure to exhaust his available administrative remedies prior to the filing of this cause of action. The Clerk is directed to file the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 1/30/2014. (ca) |
Filing 138 ORDER ADOPTING the 133 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Clerk is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/27/2012. (ca) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations, Plft's claims against Defts Donald R. Jackson and Keith Wilson are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sections 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915(b). Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/16/2010. (order was mailed to Plft at Coffee Correctional Facility, Nicholls, GA 31554) (ca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.