Martinez v. United States Of America

Martinez v. United States Of America

Petitioner:	Angel Cardenas Martinez
Respondent:	United States Of America
Case Number:	5:2017cv00120
Filed:	September 15, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Waycross Office
County:	Charlton
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 5, 2017	Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/5/2017. (ca)
October 31, 2017	Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Martinez's 1 Petition and CLOSE this case. It is also RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Martinez in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/31/2017. (csr)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 5, 2017

Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/5/2017. (ca)

October 31, 2017

Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Martinez's 1 Petition and CLOSE this case. It is also RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Martinez in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/14/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/31/2017. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. United States Of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Angel Cardenas Martinez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States Of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?