Stalvey et al v. United States Of America
| Donald Ivey Stalvey, Jr. and Candace Stalvey |
| United States Of America |
| 5:2018cv00019 |
| March 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Coffee |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER denying 78 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 07/23/2020. (MG)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 83 Bill of Costs and Plaintiff is TAXED $3,635.02 for the following necessary and statutorily permissible cost: 1. Clerk Fees $400.00; 2. Service of Process Fees $60.00; 3. Deposition Costs $2,946.00; 4. Witness Fees $80.00; 5. Medical Record Production Costs $148.52. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/22/2020. (ca) Modified on 7/22/2020 (ca).
|
|
Filing
79
JUDGMENT entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant in the amount of $68,176.33. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/23/2020. (ca)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER re 70 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. Plaintiff's Objection is OVERRULED, and the Magistrate's Order is AFFIRMED. Since the Court addressed the substance of Defendant's two Rule 52(c) motions in this Order, both are DENIED as moot. The Plaintiff is entitled to recover from the Defendant the sum of $68,716.33. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 4/9/2020. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
