Ramirez v. D. Ray James Private Institution et al
Raul Suarez Ramirez |
Mr. Norman, E. Dye, Ms. Sprulles, Warden Tracy Jones, Chaplin Samuel Eason, Captain Officer Leuger, Geo Group Inc., D. Ray James Private Institution, Officer Wilpler, Officer Kossakwski, Mrs. O'Quinn, Ms. Jeffers, Officer Staines, Assistant Chaplain N. Irre, Goodwin and C. Chalmers |
5:2019cv00014 |
February 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee payment received, Amount $350.00, Receipt BWK008413. (ca) |
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 4/8/2019 re: #5 Order. (csr) |
Filing 4 DEFICIENCY NOTICE re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pleading is not signed. (slt) |
Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by Raul Suarez Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slt) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raul Suarez Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 IFP long form, #2 Envelope)REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro.(slt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/22/2019: #3 signature page) (slt). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Raul Suarez Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Attachment 3, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(slt) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance with deficiency notice due by 2/27/2019. (slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.