Cases 1 - 10 of 100
GOODWIN v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01959
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS GOODWIN
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goodwin v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv07504
Plaintiff:
Ian Paul Goodwin
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
(PS) Gage v. Nelson et al
as 2:2026cv03005
Plaintiff:
Brittani Gage
Defendant:
Glenda Nelson, Phil Bush, Donna Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Cellular Sales Service Group, LLC
as 26-5737
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GOODWIN
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES SERVICE GROUP, LLC
Slater (PS) v. Town of Buena Vista, Colorado et al
as 1:2026cv04087
Plaintiff:
Pamela Rumney Slater
Defendant:
Town of Buena Vista, Colorado, Libby Fay, Libby (I) Fay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. City of Bessemer et al
as 2:2026cv01497
Plaintiff:
Regina Marie Smith
Defendant:
City of Bessemer, Kenneth E. Gulley, Michael Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROCKLAND MARINE CORPORATION v. M/V RACHEL GOODWIN et al
as 2:2040cv00004
Plaintiff:
ROCKLAND MARINE CORPORATION
Defendant:
M/V RACHEL GOODWIN, JOSHUA GOODWIN and GOODWIN MARINE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
ROCKLAND MARINE CORPORATION v. M/V RACHEL GOODWIN et al
as 2:2026cv00404
Plaintiff:
ROCKLAND MARINE CORPORATION
Defendant:
M/V RACHEL GOODWIN, JOSHUA GOODWIN and GOODWIN MARINE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
