Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Goodwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Amy Goodwin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Goodwin v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Charleen Goodwin
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodwin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03260
Plaintiff:
Tina Lynn Goodwin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodwin v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2022cv03118
Plaintiff:
Brandi Goodwin
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Martin, et al v. New Philadelphia Police, et al
as 5:2022cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L. Martin, O'Rhen C. Martin and O. M.
Defendant:
Police Chief Michael Goodwin, Wayne Clark, Officer Paul Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Goodwin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodwin et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03997
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodwin and Bobbie Goodwin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reffett v. City of New Philadelphia, Ohio et al
as 5:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Steven Reffett
Defendant:
Chad Dorsey, City of New Philadelphia, Ohio and Michael Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03593
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kendrick v. Erdos et al
as 2:2021cv00983
Defendant:
Institutional Insp Linnea Mahlman, Health Care Admin Goodwin, Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
