Mejia v. Johns et al
Jose Ivan Mejia |
United States Of America and Tracy Johns |
5:2020cv00074 |
June 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Administrative Remedy by Jose Ivan Mejia. Responses due by 7/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) REFERRED to Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. (MG) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process. The Court directs the United States Marshal to serve a copy of the Petition #1 and a copy of this Order by registered or certified mail upon: (1) the Attorney General of the United States; (2) the named Respondent; and (3) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Georgia. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i). Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 6/26/2020. (ca) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2020: #1 Prepared 285 forms) (ca). |
Filing 3 Letter from Jose Ivan Mejia Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (MG) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number BWK009657. (csr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Compliance due by 6/25/2020. (MG) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jose Ivan Mejia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (MG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.