Coley-Pearson v. Martin et al
Olivia Coley-Pearson |
Emily Misty Martin, Joe Stewart, The City of Douglas, Coffee County, Robert Sprinkle, Shane Edmisten and Misty Hayes |
5:2020cv00151 |
December 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 TEXT ORDER granting #22 the City Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint. The City Defendants shall filed their response to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint on or before March 8, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on January 20, 2021. (edd) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Shane Edmisten answer due 3/8/2021; Robert Sprinkle answer due 3/8/2021; Joe Stewart answer due 3/8/2021; The City of Douglas answer due 3/8/2021. (ca) |
Filing 22 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The City of Douglas. Responses due by 2/2/2021. (Adams, Jerome) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #22 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (ca) |
Filing 21 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Emily Misty Martin. Emily Misty Martin waiver sent on 1/7/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. (Strickland, Richard) |
Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Coffee County. Coffee County waiver sent on 1/7/2021, answer due 3/8/2021. (Strickland, Richard) |
Filing 19 **DUPLICATE ENTRY OF 18. Modified on 1/7/2021 (ca). |
Filing 18 CLERK'S ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Shane Edmisten answer due 1/21/2021; Robert Sprinkle answer due 1/21/2021; Joe Stewart answer due 1/21/2021; The City of Douglas answer due 1/21/2021. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 1/7/2021. (ca) |
Filing 17 **DUPLICATE ENTRY OF 16**. (Adams, Jerome) Modified on 1/7/2021 (ca). |
Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The City of Douglas. Responses due by 1/20/2021. (Adams, Jerome) |
Filing 15 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Olivia Coley-Pearson. (Weber, Gerald) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Zack Greenamyre on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Greenamyre, Zack) |
Filing 13 ORDER re the #10 Parties' Stipulation. The Court deems Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction WITHDRAWN. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the motion. The motion hearing scheduled for Monday, December 21, 2020 is cancelled, and the Parties are relieved from appearing. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/18/2020. (ca) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER granting #9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark Loudon-Brown. Gerald Weber has entered an appearance in this case and vouches he will satisfy the obligations of local counsel, as this Court's Local Rule 83.4 requires. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on December 18, 2020. (edd) |
Filing 11 TEXT ORDER granting #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeremy Dakota Cutting. Gerald Weber has entered an appearance in this case and vouches he will satisfy the obligations of local counsel, as this Court's Local Rule 83.4 requires. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on December 18, 2020. (edd) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION re #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Olivia Coley-Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Redacted Criminal Trespass Warning, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Weber, Gerald) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark Loudon-Brown Receipt Number AGASDC-2989309, Fee Amount $200, by Olivia Coley-Pearson. Responses due by 12/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Admission, #2 Exhibit A: Petitioner's Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit B: List of Petitioner's S.D. Ga. Appearances)(Weber, Gerald) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeremy D. Cutting Receipt Number AGASDC-2989264, Fee Amount $200, by Olivia Coley-Pearson. Responses due by 12/31/2020. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Admission, #2 Exhibit A: Petitioner's Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit B: List of Petitioner's S.D. Ga. Appearances)(Weber, Gerald) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mark Loudon-Brown Receipt Number AGASDC-2989309, Fee Amount $200,, #8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Jeremy D. Cutting Receipt Number AGASDC-2989264, Fee Amount $200. (ca) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Coffee County, Shane Edmisten, Emily Misty Martin, Robert Sprinkle, Joe Stewart, The City of Douglas. (ca) |
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction : ** PLEASE NOTE VENUE IS BRUNSWICK ** Motion Hearing set for 12/21/2020 10:00 AM in Brunswick - Courtroom No. 1 - before Judge Lisa G. Wood. (WS) |
Set/Reset Hearings: ** PLEASE NOTE CHANGE IN TIME ONLY ** Motion Hearing set for 12/21/2020 03:30 PM in Brunswick - Courtroom No. 1 - before Judge Lisa G. Wood. (WS) |
Filing 6 Summons Submitted (Weber, Gerald) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Olivia Coley-Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Brief in support of). (csr) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 by Olivia Coley-Pearson. (csr) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (csr) |
Filing 2 RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 12/11/2020. (csr) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Olivia Coley-Pearson. $402.00 Filing Fee Paid - Receipt Number: AGASDC-2984934. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet). (csr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.