King v. Upton et al
| Travis Napier King |
| Steve Upton, John Paul, Joe Burnette, Johnny Smith and Larry Brewton |
| 6:2008cv00109 |
| December 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition Office |
| Tattnall |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| James E. Graham |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER stating that the plaintiffs motion for IFP status on appeal is denied. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 1/25/2010. (loh)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER rejecting 33 Report and Recommendations.; granting 17 Motion to Dismiss; granting 22 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 12/17/2009. (loh)
|
|
Filing
33
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re granting in part and denying in part 17 MOTION to Dismiss and 22 MOTION to Dismiss. Objections to R&R due by 11/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 11/10/09. (slt)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations, Plaintiff's deliberate indifference to the medical needs claims against Smith and Burnette are dismissed.. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/4/09. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plft's claims for the alleged deprivation of mental health care should be dismissed re 1 Complaint filed by Travis Napier King Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 3/17/2009. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
