Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ahmed Mohamed v. WestCare Illinois, Inc., et al
as 19-1310
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, WESTCARE FOUNDATION, INC., JOE BURNETT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMED MOHAMED
Burnett v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01804
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohammed v. Westcare Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07492
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammed
Defendant:
Westcare Illinois, Inc., Westcare Foundation, Inc., Thomas J. Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv09416
Plaintiff:
Joe Burnett
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, James Morrison and Michael Taft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Burnette et al
as 4:2013cv01914
Plaintiff:
Maurio Rivers
Defendant:
Joe Burnette and Tim Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mapp v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Al Rico Mapp
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Steve Upton, Joe Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mapp v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Al Rico Mapp
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Steven Upton, Joe Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55188
Plaintiff:
JOE BURNETT, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Mapp v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2010cv00090
Plaintiff:
Al Rico Mapp
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joe Burnette, Stephen Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis Napier King v. Steve Upton, et al
as 10-10226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS NAPIER KING
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE UPTON, JOHN PAUL, JOE BURNETTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
