Mapp v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
| Al Rico Mapp |
| Georgia Department of Corrections, Joe Burnette, Stephen Upton, Dane Dasher, Carter, Crabtree, Rodney Jackson, Norris Herndon, Javanka Johnson, Simmons, Alton Mobley and Jamie Anderson |
| 6:2010cv00090 |
| October 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Tattnall |
| James E. Graham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 59 Report and Recommendations. Mapp's monetary damage claims against Burnette in his official capacity are dismissed. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 3/29/2012. (loh)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER stating that the Court rejects the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court orders plaintiff to file an amended complaint outlining the claims related to the October 23, 2008 incident. This amended complaint must be filed wi thin ten days of this Order re 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 MOTION to Dismiss Pre-Answer Motion to Dismiss filed by Javanka Johnson, Steven Upton, Jamie Anderson, Alton Mobley, Dane Dasher, Joe Burnette, Trace Simmons, Rodney Jackson, Norris Herndon. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/20/2011. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
