Cases 1 - 10 of 23
DEAMUS v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
MORANY DEAMUS
Defendant:
JAMIE ANDERSON, M. KIERSZNOWSKI and REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Jamie v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anderson
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09506
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23508
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shine v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
Larin Shine
Defendant:
Jamie Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Spengler v. Jamie Anderson, et al
as 22-55537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER, c/o Cynthia Spengler
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE ANDERSON, MITCHELL L. ANDERSON, MICHELLE J. WAGGONER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Michael Spengler v. Jamie Anderson, et al
as 21-56215
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. SPENGLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE ANDERSON, MITCHELL L. ANDERSON, MICHELLE J. WAGGONER and others
Michael R. Spengler v. Jamie Anderson et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Defendant:
Michelle J. Waggoner, Mitchell Anderson, Jeffrey Waggoner-Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Michael Spengler v. Mitchell Anderson et al
as 5:2020cv01958
Defendant:
Michelle Waggoner, Mitchell Anderson and Jamie Anderson
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
