Goings v. Pfister et al
| Fredrick Goings |
| Pfister, Dr Carnahan, Peters, Rahim, Scott, Taylor, Johnson, White, Unknown Does, Bailey, Jenkins, Fox, Gonzalez, Holman, Rabindeau, Allen, Carswell, Vegara, Sullivan, Coleman, Mr Hamilton, Flanagan, Butler-Winters, Sykes, Jefferson, Dennis, Best, Lake and Collosal |
| 1:2018cv07218 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Marvin E Aspen |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MOTION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings pursuant to Rule 59 (e) (ek, )
|
|
Filing 13
RECEIVED First Amended Complaint and by Fredrick Goings (ek, )
|
|
Filing 12
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (ek, )
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for an order directing clerk of court to send plaintiff entire document #5 and other relief. (ek, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ; Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and motion to supplement #3 and #4 are denied as incomplete and stale. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue this litigation, by December 31, 2018, Plaintiff must: either (a) submit a completed in forma pauperis application that complies with the instructions below, or (b) pre-pay the full $400.00 statutory filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to comply with the foregoing instructions, this case will be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of this order and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Review of Plaintiff's complaint is deferred, pending resolution of the filing fee issue. Plaintiff's motions for protective order #5 and for case management procedures #8 are denied as premature. Plaintiff's motion requesting permission to purchase pens at Menard Correctional Center #6 and motion for injunctive relief #7 are denied as described below. To the extent Plaintiff's supplement #9 is a motion for leave to amend his complaint, it is denied. Plaintiff may not amend his pleadings piecemeal. If Plaintiff wishes to amend, he must submit a complete amended complaint for initial review. Signed by the Honorable Marvin E. Aspen on 11/30/2018. Mailed notice(ek, )
|
|
MAILED a bland amended complaint form and an order dated 11/30/2018 to plaintiff Fredrick Goings. (ek, )
|
|
Filing 9
SUPPLEMENT to Original Complaint by Fredrick Goings (gcy, )
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for Case Management Procedures for Judge Aspen and Magistrate Rowland. (gcy, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for an order of injuctive relief by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for order. (ek, )
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for an order directing IDOC to allow plaintiff to purchase at least 10 pens per month and other relief by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings (ek, )
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for hippa qualified protective order. (Exhibits) (ek, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for leave to supplement his in forma pauperis application and financial affidavit. (ek, )
|
|
Filing 3
APPLICATION by Plaintiff Fredrick Goings for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (ek, )
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (ek, )
|
|
Filing 1
RECEIVED Complaint and no copies by Fredrick Goings. (Exhibits) (ek, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
