Cases 1 - 10 of 36,811
Jones v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Dennis Eugene Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Pistole v. Pistole et al
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Dennis Pistole
Defendant:
Bethany Pistole and Auto-Owners Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Barfield v. Centennial Bank
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Dennis Barfield
Defendant:
Centennial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dennis Clark v. Salem Media Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03920
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clark
Defendant:
Salem Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Hiner v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01696
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hiner
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Burleson et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burleson and Yvonne Burleson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Lyle William Wells, III and Trey Wells Insurance Agency, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DOMBROWSKI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00741
Petitioner:
DENNIS DOMBROWSKI, II
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
WALKER v. FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2024cv05940
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WALKER
Defendant:
FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WALKER v. FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
as 3:2024cv05940
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WALKER
Defendant:
FARMERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
