Hughes v. Boebel et al
| Marcus Hughes |
| John Doe, Neuman, Phillips, Zahts, Kostman, Lank, Wexford Medical, Nolan, Jane Doe, Kipping, Appenzeller, Tuell, Black, Clark, Andrews, Chantler, Martin, Allen, Jane Doe Nurses, Hefafinger, Varga, Chess, Boebel, Kimble, Hammer, Jennings, Lawson and Jane Doe Nurse |
| 3:2019cv50281 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Iain D Johnston |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court grants Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 and orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to immediately deduct $3.08 from his account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer of the facility having custody of Plaintiff and to the Court's Fiscal Department. The Court has reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A and finds that Plaintiff states a plausible claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition. Summonses, however, shall not issue at this time. The Court requests that Stephen P. Benson of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, 525 West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL 60661, assist Plaintiff in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rule 83.37 (N.D. Ill.). Counsel is recruited to investigate the claims in this case and in Hughes v. UIC Hospital, et al., Case No. 19 C 7206 (N.D. Ill.) (Kennelly, J.), and to submit an amended complaint addressing any appropriate claims. Recruited counsel falls within the class of users listed in the Electronic Public Access fee schedule adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, therefore, counsel shall be exempt from the payment of fees for access via PACER to the electronic case files maintained in this court for the above-captioned case and the previous cases filed in this court by this plaintiff (18 C 3141 and 19 C 7206) only. Counsel is directed to open a separate PACER account for use in this case (and the issues raised in 19 C 7206) only. Recruited counsel shall not be exempt from the payment of fees incurred in connection with other uses of the PACER system in this court. This exemption is valid immediately and for the duration of counsel's participation in this matter. This exemption may be revoked at the discretion of the Court at any time. Counsel shall contact the PACER Service Center at 1-800-676-6856 or via the link below to create the new PACER account and to make any necessary arrangements for the waiver. The Clerk is further directed to send a copy of this order (electronically where available) to: (1) the PACER Service Center at http://www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/register.html; (2) the Systems Department of the Northern District of Illinois; (3) the Court's Fiscal Department; (4) recruited counsel; and (5) Plaintiff. Counsel should as soon as practicable file an appearance and begin an investigation. Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 11/8/2019. Mailed notice. (mma, )
|
| MAILED Order dated 11/8/2019 #8 to Trust Fund Officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration and the plaintiff. (mma, ) |
| Filing 7 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly for all further proceedings. Honorable John Z. Lee no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Executive Committee on 11/7/2019. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Pursuant to IOP 11(d), this case is generally referred to the magistrate judge, except for the following types of hearings and motions: (1) initial review of complaints in cases filed by prisoners or persons seeking a waiver of the filing fee; (2) dispositive motions; (3) Daubert motions and related hearings; (4) any motions filed while a summary judgment motion is pending or thereafter; (5) motions concerning the scheduling or conduct of the trial; (6) all final pretrial motions, including motions in limine; and (7) trial. These excluded matters will be handled by Judge Lee, absent further order of the Court. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 19-0007, dated 6/27/2019, this case is assigned to the Honorable John Z. Lee and referred generally to the Honorable Iain D. Johnston. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/27/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 4 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that 19 CV 50281, Hughes v. Boebel et al, is currently assigned to the Hon. Joan H. Lefkow; therefore It is hereby ordered that 19 CV 50281, Hughes v. Boebel et al, be reassigned to another active district judge listed in the Amended General Order 19-0007 pursuant to 28 USC 294(b). Case reassigned to the Honorable John Z. Lee for all further proceedings. Honorable Joan H. Lefkow no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/29/2019. (jp, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Marcus Hughes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (pg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (pg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 2 copies by Marcus Hughes (pg, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/29/2019: #1 Envelope) (pg, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
