Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ross v. Knoxville County Detention Center et al
as 3:2026cv00418
Plaintiff:
Jacob T. Ross
Defendant:
Knoxville County Detention Center, Knoxville County Police Dept, NBA Youngboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chess v. Buckner et al
as 1:2026cv01567
Plaintiff:
Nicole Chess
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Jennifer Cortina, Laura Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harviley III v. Tack et al
as 3:2026cv50354
Plaintiff:
Samuel Harviley III
Defendant:
A. Tack, J. Chess, P. Johnson and others
:
Scanning Joliet Treatment Center and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peiffer (PS) v. Worley et al
as 1:2026cv03700
Plaintiff:
Paul Brian Peiffer
Defendant:
Jeff Worley and Michelle Chess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cain v. Moore et al
as 5:2026cv00200
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Judge Andra Moore, Dennis Foust, Judge Jaminson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chess v. Acworth Bells Ferry RE, LLC
as 1:2026cv03710
Plaintiff:
Shelena Chess
Defendant:
Acworth Bells Ferry RE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 (b) Labor - Minimum wage or overtime compensation
O'Quinn v. Bruno et al
as 3:2026cv50278
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Defendant:
Sup. Bruno, Warden Tack, Block and others
:
Scanning Dixon and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benshoof, et al. v. Admon, et al.
as 26-3113
Plaintiff:
KURT BENSHOOF and BRIANA GAGE
Defendant:
MOSHE ADMON, DANIEL AUDERER, JUSTIN BOOKER and others
(SS) Chess v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00995
Plaintiff:
Andrew Edward Chess
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
