Williams v. Wexford et al
Danika D Williams |
Dr. Mitcheff, IWP, Aramark, Warden Johnson, IDOC Health Service, Wexford, Derrick Rucker, Nikki Tafoyci, DOC, Dr Mershon and Nick Sleveking |
1:2020cv00382 |
November 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Holly A Brady |
Susan L Collins |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter from Danika D Williams to see if court received paperwork filed. (Copy of docket sheet sent) (bas) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned from Danika D. Williams as Undeliverable re #1 Pro Se Complaint. (Remailed to include DOC number on envelope) (bas) |
Filing 3 ORDER transferring case to the Southern District of Indiana. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 11/13/20. (Copy mailed to pro se party, electronically transferred to Southern Indiana)(mlc) Modified on 11/16/2020 to add text (mlc). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Danika D Williams. (bas) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Aramark, DOC, IDOC Health Service, IWP, Warden Johnson, Dr Mershon, Dr. Mitcheff, Derrick Rucker, Nick Sleveking, Nikki Tafoyci, Wexford, filed by Danika D Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Envelope) (File stamped copy mailed to Plaintiff) (bas) Modified on 11/3/2020 (bas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.