Bargo v. Porter County Indiana et al
Michael E Bargo, Jr |
Porter County Indiana, Vicki Urbanik, Elizabeth A Knight, Karen M Martin, David L Chidester, Michelle L Clancy and Mary R Harper |
2:2016cv00177 |
May 19, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Hammond Office |
XX US, Outside State |
John E Martin |
Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 17(a)(3) the Court allows time for the trustee to have the bankruptcy case re-opened and to ratify, join, or be substituted into this lawsuit, or for Mr. Bargo to take action (if possible) to enable him to pursue these claims himself. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions to dismiss (DEs 21 and 30 ). If by 9/20/2017 the trustee has not taken any relevant action regarding this lawsuit and Mr. Bargo has not taken any action enabling him to pursue these claims himself, the Court will dismiss this case as to all Defendants without further notice. If by 9/20/2017 the trustee has taken relevant action or if Mr. Bargo has taken action enabling him to pursue these claims himself, th en the Defendants may move for dismissal as set forth in the Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 7/19/17. (cc: Bargo, bankruptcy trustee Michael K. Desmond at 10 South LaSalle, Suite 3600, Chicago, Illinois 60603 and at mdesmond@fslegal.com)(jld) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.