In re: Five Non-Party Deposition Subpoenas Issued
Respondent: Deborah Walton
Movant: BMO Harris Bank
Case Number: 2:2017mc00089
Filed: November 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office: Hammond Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: John E Martin
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER granting 1 Motion to Quash Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 12/5/2017. (cc: pro se party, Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker-Lynch USDC Southern District of Indiana) (smb) Modified on 12/6/2017 to update docket text to opinion and order(rmc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Five Non-Party Deposition Subpoenas Issued
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: BMO Harris Bank
Represented By: Jacob V Bradley
Represented By: Lucy R Dollens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Deborah Walton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?