Cases 1 - 10 of 757
Roper et al v. BMO Harris Bank
as 9:2024cv80364
Plaintiff:
Kemarly Roper and Stephanie Roper
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BMO Bank N.A. f/k/a BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Nijjar
as 1:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. f/k/a BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Gurnek S Nijjar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
BMO Bank N.A. v. Gonzalo Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Gonzalo Trucking, Inc., Gonzalo Valderrama and Christian Valderrama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nguyen v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Yen Thi Hoang Nguyen
Defendant:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A. and BMO Harris Financial Advisors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fair Labor Standards Act
MICHAEL S. HARRISON, LLC v. BMO BANK N.A.
as 2:2024cv00013
Defendant:
BMO BANK N.A. and BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. HARRISON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
BMO Bank NA v. Werner
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank NA and BMO Harris Bank NA
Defendant:
Lisa Werner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BMO Bank N.A. v. Terri Durand Trucking Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Terri Durand Trucking Inc., Terri Durand, Badger State Recovery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BMO Harris Bank v. Arambula
as 23-11260
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Jose Arambula and Jose Arambula, an individual resident and citizen of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
