Prince et al v. Blinken et al
| Sarah Renee Prince and Prince |
| Antony Blinken and Julie M Stufft |
| 2:2023cv00100 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Philip P Simon |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sarah Renee Prince. Antony Blinken served on 3/31/2023, answer due 5/30/2023; Julie M Stufft served on 3/31/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. (George PHV, Alexandra)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Julie M Stufft, U.S. Attorney and Merrick Garland, Attorney General. NOTE: The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. (rmf)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alexandra George PHV for Prince and Sarah Renee Prince. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 3/22/2023. (ace)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION for Attorney Alexandra George to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Sarah Renee Prince, Prince ; Receipt #642, $96.00. (rmf)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Julie M Stufft (Filing fee $ 402.) Receipt #643, filed by Sarah Renee Prince. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rmf)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
