Whitfield El v. Latulip et al
| Lawrence Whitfield El and Lawrence Whitfield |
| Matthew Latulip, Marce Gonzalez Jr., Warden, Cook and Stephanie |
| 2:2024cv00059 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff, Lawrence Whitfield El, is ORDERED to either pay the entire remaining balance of the filing fee ($350.00) or provide a written explanation showing cause why he has not paid the initial partial filing fee and any required installment payments WITH a copy of his inmate ledger showing every transaction since February 15, 2024. He is CAUTIONED if he does not respond by 05/08/2024, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 04/10/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The motion for status report #7 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 4/1/24. (Copy mailed to pro se party). (nhc)
|
| Filing 9 Letter to Lawrence Whitfield in response to DE #8 . (Copy mailed to plaintiff) (nae) |
| Filing 8 Letter from Lawrence Whitfield El requesting copy of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (nae) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Status Report by Plaintiff Lawrence Whitfield El. (copy of docket sent to Whitfield)(Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mrm) Modified on 3/12/2024 to add routing (mrm). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: For reasons outlined in Order, the plaintiff's motion #3 is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 2/29/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ash)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDERS the Plaintiff, Lawrence Whitfield El, IDOC # 267655, Cook County Jail# 756061, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $51.30 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the Plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit)to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to each facility where the Plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 2/15/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Cook County Jail as directed in Order). (nhc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to close case, 3:24-cv-139 and open a new case with these filings in the Hammond Division with the same judges. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 2/15/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ash)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Access to Jail Law Library by Plaintiff Lawrence Whitfield El. (kmt) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Lawrence Whitfield El. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cook, Marce Gonzalez Jr., Matthew Latulip, Stephanie, Warden, filed by Lawrence Whitfield El. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons and USM 285 form, #3 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Whitfield El)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
