Lazur v. Lake County Sheriff et al
Richard Lazur |
Stozer, John Doe, Lake County Sheriff, Moreno, Bhowling, Powell, Warden and Gore |
2:2024cv00309 |
September 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Scott J Frankel |
Damon R Leichty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; WAIVING the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING the plaintiff, to pay (and cust agy to remit) payments as outlined until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds and to send a copy of this order to each facility where the Pla is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 9/10/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party and Inmate Trust Fund Acct @ Porter CJ)(mrm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Richard Lazur. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(jdb) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Bhowling, Gore, John Doe, Lake County Sheriff, Moreno, Powell, Stozer, Warden(individual and official capacity), Warden(Dep., individual and official capacity), filed by Richard Lazur. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (File stamped copy and docket sheet mailed back to pro se party) (jdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.