Johnson v. Carter et al
| Paul David Johnson |
| Dr Carter and CCS |
| 3:2015cv00122 |
| March 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| Elkhart |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| Robert L Miller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING Paul David Johnson leave to proceed against Dr. Carter in his individual capacity for compensatory and punitive for denying him adequate medical care on 3/18/2013, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; DISMISSING Cor rect Care Solutions; DISMISSING all other claims; DIRECTING the clerk to transmit the summons and USM-285 for Dr. Carter to the USMS along with a copy of the amended complaint 12 and this order, to effect service of process on Dr. Carter pursuant to 28: 1915(d); and ORDERING, pursuant to 42:1997e(g)(2), that Dr. Carter respond, as provided for in the Fed R Civ P and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 10/29/2015. (lhc)(cc: Pla and USMS (Dr. Carter))
|
|
Filing
7
OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Pro Se Complaint filed by Paul David Johnson. Court GRANTS Paul David Johnson to and including 9/28/2015 to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 8/17/15. cc: Johnson with 42 U.S.C. § 1983 package (mc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
