Cases 1 - 10 of 40
In re: Alex Ulep, et al v. State of California, et al
as 23-15806
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO DELGADILLO LOPEZ, ALEX LOPEZ, ALEX ULEP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Paul Johnson v. Ronald Broomfield, et al
as 23-15376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden and L. TOBIN
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 23-15167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, MD., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, MD and others
Paul Johnson v. Sanchez, et al
as 23-15145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SANCHEZ, Correctional Officer, BOISE, Lieutenant and R. BROOMFIELD
Johnson v. Spurgeon et al
as 4:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
D. Spurgeon, N. Avila, A. Pachynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv09053
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Acting Warden Ronald Broomfield and L. Tobin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sanchez et al
as 4:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sanchez, Lieutenant Boise and R. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
Paul Johnson v. Thuddy, et al
as 22-16116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
THUDDY, M.D., CMO, F. KREITLER, M.D., L. W. ROHLFING, M.D. and others
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
