Woodson v. IDOC et al
Leondre Woodson |
IDOC and Kim Myers |
3:2018cv00557 |
July 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
South Bend Office |
Miami |
Jon E DeGuilio |
Michael G Gotsch |
Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Southern; Case Number 1:18-cv-02205. Original file and docket sheet received. (Docket sheet with INND case number sent to Woodson) |
Filing 4 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, on 7/20/2018. (NAD) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/24/2018.] |
Filing 3 CLOSED TRANSFER to the Northern District of Indiana. The above action is now TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, at South Bend, Indiana. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/20/2018.(NAD) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/24/2018.] |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/24/2018.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IDOC, KIM MYERS, filed by LEONDRE WOODSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/24/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.