Reave v. Tobin et al
| Kevin Reaves |
| Holland, IDOC, Tobin and Samuelson |
| 3:2018cv00809 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Philip P Simon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Kevin Reaves re: filing fees (nae) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff Kevin LeViel Reaves' #3 Letter filed 10/19/2018 is construed as a motion to voluntarily dismiss, and is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/24/2018. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (tc)
|
| Filing 3 Letter from Kevin Reaves re: matter is resolved (nae) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff Kevin Reave is GRANTED to 11/5/2018 to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis petition accompanied by his trust fund ledgers for the past six months. Reave is CAUTIONED that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 10/10/18. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ksp)
|
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against IDOC, Holland, Samuelson, Tobin, filed by Kevin Reave.(No filing fee or IFP received) (Returned copy with case number to Reave)(nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
