Fleming v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
Karl A Fleming |
Cartagena, Jane Reed, Aramark, Robert Wright, Thomas, J Desch, Malthese, Mr Faenza, Indiana Department of Correction, Spiegal, Sevier, Wexford Medical Services, Booker T Jones, Dave Leonard, M Walla, Potter, John R Harvil, Sizemore, Romeo and S Dias |
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
3:2019cv00646 |
August 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
Michael G Gotsch |
Damon R Leichty |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Karl Fleming. (nae) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cartagena, J Desch, Indiana Department of Correction, Dave Leonard, Malthese, Jane Reed, Sevier, Spiegal, Thomas, Robert Wright, S Dias, Romeo, Sizemore, John R Harvil, filed by Karl A Fleming.(No IFP received) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae) |
![]() |
Filing 2 PRO SE COMPLAINT with 0 copies of summons forms and 0 copies of USM-285 forms against Aramark, Cartagena, J Desch, Mr Faenza, Indiana Department of Correction, Booker T Jones, Dave Leonard, Malthese, Potter, Jane Reed, Sevier, Spiegal, Thomas, M Walla, Wexford Medical Services, Robert Wright, filed by Karl A Fleming. (No filing fee or IFP received) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae) |
Filing 1 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program (Westville) by Karl A Fleming (nae) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.