Singh v. LaPorte County Jail et al
| Michael Phillip Singh and Michael P Singh |
| LaPorte County Jail, John T Boyd, Al Ott, Eguia, Murray and John Wilcher |
| 3:2022cv00260 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Mail Returned from Michael Phillip Singh as Undeliverable re #8 Order. Envelope marked: Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward/No Forwarding address - Released. (mrm)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: In the interests of justice, the Court will EXTEND the deadline for Mr. Singh to file an amended complaint to 5/31/2022, to allow time for him to update his address with the court. Mr. Singh is CAUTIONED that if he does not file an amended complaint by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice under 28 U.S.C. 1915A because the current complaint does not state a claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 5/10/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(asd)
|
|
Filing 7
Mail Returned re #6 Order from Michael Phillip Singh as Undeliverable - Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward. (nhc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The court DENIES the motion to amend the complaint #5 and REMINDS Mr. Singh that he must file an amended complaint by 05/10/2022 to avoid dismissal of his case as explained in the court's order of April 11, 2022 #4 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 04/19/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (jdb)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Amend Suit and Complaint re #1 Pro Se Complaint by Plaintiff Michael Phillip Singh. (kms)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING Michael Phillip Singh until 5/10/2022, to file an amended complaint and CAUTIONING him that if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915A without further notice because the current complaint does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 4/11/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Phillip Singh; WAIVING the initial partial filing fee; ORDERING the plaintiff, Michael Phillip Singh, IDOC # 198243, LaPorte County Jail # 20128747, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTING the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTING the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Damon R Leichty on 4/5/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party and LaPorte County Jail)(asd)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Michael Phillip Singh. (kms)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against John T Boyd, Eguia, LaPorte County Jail, Murray, Al Ott, John Wilcher, filed by Michael Phillip Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Singh)(kms)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
