Cases 1 - 10 of 121
McColly v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Inmates
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen McColly and Justin A McColly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, Cheryl and Al
Plaintiff:
Michael Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Dixon and Michael Dixon
Defendant:
Smith and LaPorte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeeley v. Solanger et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, LaPorte County and Solanger
Plaintiff:
Arthur C McNeeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph James v. Timothy Mace, et al
as 24-1037
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. JAMES
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MACE, Corporal Jailer also known as TIMOTHY EARL MACE, DALTON P. PFLUGHAUPT, individual, former employee of Michigan City Civil City, KELLY J. KENNEDY and others
Laura v Whintey et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Martell Laura
Defendant:
Whintey, LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAURA v. WHINTEY et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
MARTELL LAURA
Defendant:
WHINTEY, LAPORTE COUNTY JAIL and RON HEEG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Airas Peterson
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Sherriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
