Mann v. Miller et al
Plaintiff: Lucas Robert-Jay Mann
Defendant: Miller, Davis and Rojo
Case Number: 3:2022cv00839
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Michael G Gotsch
Referring Judge: Robert L Miller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Reconsidering Filing Fees' by Lucas Robert-Jay Mann. (Attachment: #1 Envelope)(jdb)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons sent to Sgt. Miller, Property Officer Davis, and Lt. Rojo. Waiver of Service due by 12/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Opinion and Order, #2 Complaint) (sej)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPINION AND ORDER: The court GRANTS Lucas Robert-Jay Mann leave to proceed against Sgt. Miller, Property Officer Davis, and Lt. Rojo in their individual capacities for monetary damages for subjecting him to excessive force on 03/21/2022, in violation of the Eighth Amendment; DISMISSES all other claims; DIRECTS the clerk, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), to request Waiver of Service from (and if necessary, the United States Marshals Service to use any lawful means to locate and serve process on) Sgt. Miller, Property Officer Davis, and Lt. Rojo at the Indiana Department of Correction, with a copy of this order and the complaint #1 ; ORDERS the Indiana Department of Correction to provide the full name, date of birth, and last known home address of any defendant who does not waive service if it has such information; ORDERS, under 42 U.S.C. 1997e(g)(2), Sgt. Miller, Property Officer Davis, and Lt. Rojo to respond, as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and N.D. Ind. L.R. 10-1(b), only to the claims for which the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in this screening order; and DENIES the motion for preliminary injunctive relief #7 . Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 11/22/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(sej)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction , titled as Immediate Injunction, by Plaintiff Lucas Robert-Jay Mann. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(kmt)
November 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #5 ; ORDERS the plaintiff, Lucas Robert-Jay Mann, IDOC # 132720, to immediately pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) $68.03 to the clerk in payment of the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 11/03/2022. (Copy mailed as directed in Order) (jdb)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Lucas Robert-Jay Mann. (kmt)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING Lucas Robert-Jay Mann until November 9, 2022, to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/6/22. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mlc)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 10/6/2022. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ash)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Lucas Robert-Jay Mann. (kmt)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Davis, Miller, Rojo, filed by Lucas Robert-Jay Mann. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Mann)(kmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mann v. Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lucas Robert-Jay Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rojo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?