Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hawkins v. Macomber et al
as 5:2026cv09970
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Hawkins
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Howard Mosely, E. Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv09487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04116
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07250
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barberi v. EL CEDRO ROJO WOOD GALLERY LLC et al
as 1:2026cv25865
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
EL CEDRO ROJO WOOD GALLERY LLC and 2370 W. 8 LANE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Red's Plastering Incorporated et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2026cv06014
Plaintiff:
Red's Plastering Incorporated, Guillermo G Rojo and Nohemi Rojo
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
(HC) Rojo v. USA (2255 2:21-cr-007)
as 2:2026cv02522
Petitioner:
Rosario Zamora Rojo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Devens v. Rojo-Cruz et al
as 3:2026cv00989
Plaintiff:
Iris Devens
Defendant:
Manuel Rojo-Cruz and Smooth Operators
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04470
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
