Jones - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Carter et al
| Audrain Jones |
| Robert E Carter, Ron Neal, Dawn Buss, Wardlow, Dustin, Dujuan Lott, Wilson, Wynn, Stovall, Ericka Hilliker, Teague, Walden, Haskell, Lynch, John Doe, Brown, Kay, Aramark Correctional Contractor, Wayne, Jim Roe and John Roe |
| WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) |
| 3:2023cv00208 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (ash)
|
|
Filing 5
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDERS the plaintiff, Audrain Jones, IDOC # 133236, to pay (and the facility having custody of him to automatically remit) to the clerk of this court 20 percent of the money he receives for each calendar month during which he receives $10.00 or more, until the $402.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk of court to ensure that a copy of this order is mailed to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk of court to return, unfiled, any papers filed in any civil case by or on behalf of Jones (except for a notice of appeal in this case and documents related to that appeal, or documents filed in a habeas corpus proceeding) until he has paid in full all outstanding fees and sanctions in all civil actions in any federal court; and DIRECTS the clerk to note on the docket of this case any attempted filings in violation of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 3/15/2023. (Copy mailed to Westville C.F.)(ash)
|
|
Filing 4
Docket sheet and file stamped copy of Complaint to be distributed to Audrain Jones #133236. (Attachments: #1 File stamped copy of Complaint)(kmt)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Audrain Jones. (kmt)
|
|
Filing 2
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Aramark Correctional Contractor, Brown, Dawn Buss, Robert E Carter, John Doe, Dustin, Haskell, Ericka Hilliker, Kay, Dujuan Lott, Lynch, Ron Neal, Jim Roe, John Roe, Stovall, Teague, Walden, Wardlow, Wayne, Wilson, Wynn, filed by Audrain Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmt)
|
|
Filing 1
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Audrain Jones. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
