Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robles v. Shenzhenzhi Ma Hua Er Kai Technology Co., Ltd
as 1:2026cv11375
Plaintiff: Special Admin Jair Robles
Defendant: SHENZHENZHI MA HUA ER KAI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD, a Foreign Corporation d/b/a PAISEEC and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Suffolk County Public Administrator et al
as 2:2026cv05732
Plaintiff: THE SECRETARY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, an agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Suffolk County Public Administrator, as Administrator of the Estate of Gerold Barber aka Jerold Barber aka Jerold M. Barber, Kay Morrison, William Bonine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00954
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hewitt v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2026cv13507
Plaintiff: Kai Hewitt
Defendant: FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lecus v. Gunderson et al
as 2:2026cv01690
Plaintiff: Kay Lecus
Defendant: Karen Gunderson, Brian Gunderson and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Michael Burgess v. Craig Crane, et al
as 26-2870
Plaintiff: Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant: Craig Crane, Warden, Buchanan County Prosecutor's Office, Kristina S. Zeit, Prosecuting Attorney and others
Cole v. De Pena et al
as 5:2026cv05908
Plaintiff: Kay Cole
Defendant: Bolivar De Pena and Mission Oaks HOA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kay Investment LLC v. Ohio Security Insurance Company
as 8:2026cv02688
Plaintiff: Kay Investment LLC
Defendant: Ohio Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Teng et al v. Hanaya Omakase Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08004
Plaintiff: Yoke Hon Teng
Defendant: Hanaya Omakase Inc. d/b/a Hanaya Omakase, 332 Sushi Kai LLC d/b/a Sushi Kai East Village, 11 Sushi Kai Inc. d/b/a Sushi Kai West Village and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2026cv00354
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?