Hawkins v. Conley et al
| John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El |
| Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner, Richard Brown and WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2024cv00315 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| John E Martin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
USCA Case Number 24-1880 for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by John A Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 PLRA Fee Notice and Order)(nae)
|
|
Filing 10
Short Record Sent to US Court of Appeals re #7 Notice of Appeal. No appeal fees paid. (eeb)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff John A Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(eeb)
|
|
Filing 8
Petition for Certificate of Appealability by Plaintiff John A Hawkins. (eeb)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF APPEAL re #4 by John A Hawkins. (eeb)
|
|
Filing 6
Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by John A Hawkins. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (eeb)
|
|
Filing 5
CLERK'S ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (ash)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION AND ORDER: This case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A because the complaint fails to state any viable claims. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 4/29/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ash) Modified on 5/1/2024 to show opinion (ash).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 , WAIVES the initial partial filing fee, ORDERS the plaintiff, John Anthony Hawkins-El, IDOC # 956724, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds, and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen on 4/23/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (rmf)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff John A Hawkins. (nae)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against Donny Betzner, Richard Brown, Tonya Conley, filed by John A Hawkins. (Returned copy with case number to plaintiff) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(nae)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
