Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Hawkins v. Conley et al
as 3:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Tonya Conley, Donny Betzner and Richard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Kirby et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Kate Mayes, Kirby, Shaw and others
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Hawkins v. Frank Vanihel
as 23-3352
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN A. HAWKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK VANIHEL
HAWKINS-EL v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
K. FISCHER, PORTER-MARTS, MATT LEHOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Angle et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Nathan Angle, B Myers, Ind Dep't of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS-EL v. ANGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
NATHAN ANGLE and B. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Lumpkin
as 23-40313
Petitioner / Appellant:
John F. Hawkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
HAWKINS-EL v. VANIHEL
as 1:2022cv02331
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAWKINS-EL v. VANIHEL
as 2:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Lumpkin
as 2:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
John F Hawkins
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
