Hawkins v. Kirby et al
| John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El |
| Kate Mayes, Kirby, Shaw, Sowards, Hamilton, K Mayes, Charles Calvert, Owens, Voltaire, Josh Morgan, France and Griffin |
| WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only) |
| 3:2024cv00137 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Jon E DeGuilio |
| John E Martin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RECEIPT of duplicate copies of DE #5 , #6 and #7 (without page 3) from John A Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Duplicate copy of DE #6 , #2 Duplicate copy of DE #7 without page 3)(kmt) |
| Filing 7 RECEIPT of Prisoner Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis from John A Hawkins. (Previously granted pursuant to DE #4 ) (kmt) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Amend #1 Pro Se Complaint by Plaintiff John A Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit to Proposed Amended Complaint)(kmt) |
| Filing 5 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by John A Hawkins. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The court GRANTS the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 ; WAIVES the initial partial filing fee; ORDERS the plaintiff, John A. Hawkins, IDOC # 956724, to pay (and the facility having custody to automatically remit) to the clerk 20% of the money received for each calendar month during which $10.00 or more is received, until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full; DIRECTS the clerk to create a ledger for receipt of these funds; and DIRECTS the clerk to send a copy of this order to each facility where the plaintiff is housed until the filing fee has been paid in full. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 02/13/2024. (Copy mailed as directed in Order)(jdb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court ORDERS John A. Hawkins-El to file an amended complaint as described above by 3/14/2024; and CAUTIONS John A. Hawkins-El if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/13/2024. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ash)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff John A Hawkins. (kmt) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Charles Calvert, France, Griffin, Hamilton, Kirby, Kate Mayes, Josh Morgan, Owens, Shaw, Sowards, Voltaire, filed by John A Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Hawkins)(kmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
