MILLER v. COX et al
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. MILLER
Defendant: DUANE BURGESS, JOHN DOE, ANDREWS, DOUG COX and RYAN BLAKER
Case Number: 1:2018cv03966
Filed: December 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Status of Case to the Extent Consistent with this Entry - The plaintiff shall continue to promptly report any future changes of address. The clerk shall update the plaintiff's address at the Johnson County Jail and shall include a copy of docket 8 with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/31/2019. (JRB)
January 30, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION Requesting Status of Case, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT L. MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE - The plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. The plaintiff shall have through February 22, 2019, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. The clerk shall update the plaintiff's address as reflected on page 7 of the complaint. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/22/2019.(JRB)
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to the Complaint to 2/1/19 - Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 12/27/2018. (JRB)
December 26, 2018 Filing 6 Submission - VERIFIED NOTICE TO COURT AS TO REMOVAL PLEADINGS AND SUBMISSION OF CORRECTED ATTACHMENTS, filed by Defendants ANDREWS, RYAN BLAKER, DUANE BURGESS, DOUG COX, JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (Corrected State Court Record to Removal Pleading) (CCS, Complaint, Motion for Fee Waiver, Order on Fee Waiver, Order on Recusal, Appearance), #2 Supplement (Corrected State Court Complaint attachment to Removal Pleading))(Layden, Daniel)
December 18, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 1, 2019 to Respond to Complaint, filed by Defendants ANDREWS, RYAN BLAKER, DUANE BURGESS, DOUG COX, JOHN DOE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Layden, Daniel)
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB)
December 17, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by William W. Barrett on behalf of Defendants OFFICER ANDREWS, RYAN BLAKER, DUANE BURGESS, DOUG COX, JOHN DOE. (Barrett, William)
December 17, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Joseph Layden on behalf of Defendants OFFICER ANDREWS, RYAN BLAKER, DUANE BURGESS, DOUG COX, JOHN DOE. (Layden, Daniel)
December 17, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Johnson Superior Court No. 4, case number 41D04-1811-MI-000294, filed by OFFICER ANDREWS, JOHN DOE, DUANE BURGESS, DOUG COX, RYAN BLAKER. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5199805) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record (Complaint, Motion for Fee Waiver, Order on Fee Waiver, Order of Recusal, Appearance of William W. Barrett and Daniel J. Layden), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Layden, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MILLER v. COX et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DUANE BURGESS
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Layden
Represented By: William W. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Layden
Represented By: William W. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREWS
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Layden
Represented By: William W. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOUG COX
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Layden
Represented By: William W. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN BLAKER
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Layden
Represented By: William W. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?