Cases 1 - 10 of 74,288
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01688
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Pierson v. USA
as 4:2024cv01072
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Andrew Scott Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(PS) Soloman v. Scheper et al
as 2:2024at01547
Defendant:
Patricia Guerrero, Sidneyr. Thomas, Karen E. Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Gamal Soloman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Goodman v. Goodman et al
as 2:2024cv01037
Defendant:
Shelli Hayes, Sheriff of Dubuque County, City of Dubuque and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Andrew Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01038
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 All Writs Act
Verch v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv04398
Plaintiff:
Andrew Verch
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Torres et al v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv09304
Plaintiff:
Visar Balidemaj, Robert Aranzullo, John Alfonzo and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Carrillo et al v. DOHA NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv08393
Plaintiff:
Victor Ventura Locon Morales, Mateo Genis Carrillo and Luis Humberto Locon Morales
Defendant:
Andria Jimenez, DOHA NYC Inc., Andrew Caceres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
FELDMAN v. FITCH et al
as 2:2024cv06521
Defendant:
RYAN FITCH and MICHAEL FITCH
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
