WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
| RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. |
| SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL, LAUREN KUPP, BOBBY RIGGS, ELIZABETH BENNETT, TAYLOR HILL and HEATHER |
| 1:2023cv02058 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER Granting Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Granting Motion to Incorporate Signature - #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis are GRANTED. The assessment of an initial partial filing fee is WAIVED. Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the full $350 filing fee when he is able. #10 Motion to Incorporate Signature is GRANTED to the extent that the court recognizes that Mr. Wheatley has sworn to the truth of the allegations in his complaint under penalty of perjury. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 12/21/2023. (LBT)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Incorporate Signature, filed by Plaintiff ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. (JSR) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KAA) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DWH) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through January 2, 2024, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) (Main Document 7 replaced on 12/1/2023) (MEH). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Misspelled Name, filed by Plaintiff RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JRB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BEDWELL, ELIZABETH BENNETT, SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, HEATHER, TAYLOR HILL, LAUREN KUPP, BOBBY RIGGS, filed by RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
