Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whipple v. Barron et al
as 1:2023cv00882
Counter Defendant:
Thomas Whipple
Defendant:
Daniel E. Barron, Olga B.K. Barron, Jennifer C. Counselman and others
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHRISTHOPER HOLCOMB, VARTHEL, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Harvey et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Michael Maxwell Hill, King Michael Tutankhaman and Grand Royal Prince Michael Dompledore, III
Defendant:
Markus Harvey, Marcos Harvey, Cameron Rye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KLINE v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2020cv00663
Defendant:
JOHN MANNING, FIRESTONE, JESSICA PEREZ and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv74833
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ECKES v. OCHELTREE et al
as 2:2018cv00559
Defendant:
KELLY LOVELL, NATHAN DUGGAR, CHANTELL KNEPP and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN ECKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luxottica Group S.p.A., et al. v. Yiyi
as 1:2016cv08943
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Yiyi, zuzhishuai and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Carnes et al v. Taylor & Hill, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00378
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Carnes and Paul Juarez
Defendant:
Taylor & Hill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
