Cases 1 - 10 of 241
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
EARL MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, CASEY CAMBEL, BARBARA RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brand et al v. TQTO Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brand and Marcela Castro
Defendant:
TQTO CORP. and JOSEPH BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BEDWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. BEDWELL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brumfield v. Unknown Parties
as 4:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Quaraii Rashad Brumfield
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Crystal Ann Jones, Charity Bedwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bedwell v. K&B Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
William R. Bedwell
Defendant:
K&B Transport, Inc., William Shockley and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ORR v. CORRIGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CORRIGAN, BYRD, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR, IV
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DANIEL BEDWELL, COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CARTER v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
BRIAN BUTLER and DANIEL BEDWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEATLEY v. BRYD et al
as 1:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
RAY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR. and ROY EDWARD WHEATLEY, JR.
Defendant:
SAMUEL BRYD, CENTURION, BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
