Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Bedwell v. The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
as 4:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bedwell
Defendant:
The Maples Health and Rehabilitation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brooks v. Bedwell et al
as 4:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Latonya R Brooks
Defendant:
James Bedwell, Jarren Terry, Cody Brumley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Estate of Brian N. Brooks v. Bedwell et al
as 4:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Brian N. Brooks and Estate of Brian N. Brooks
Defendant:
James Bedwell, Jarren Terry, Cody Brumley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Bedwell v. Cossey et al
as 2:2018cv00108
Defendant:
John Does, G Adam Cossey and Hudson Potts & Bernstein LLP
Plaintiff:
Bettye Bedwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Manek et al
as 4:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
Fabian Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Clifford Manek, Zachary Milligan, Andy Kurez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bedwell v. Stewart et al
as 1:2014cv00058
Plaintiff:
Edward Brian Bedwell
Defendant:
Robbie Stewart, Daniel Riley and Matt Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McSwain v. Hastings et al
as 4:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Cedric McSwain
Defendant:
Josh Hastings, Hunter Glover , Brad Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bedwell v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv01623
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bedwell
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc and Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bedwell v. AT&T Corporation
as 5:2011cv05150
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bedwell
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henderson et al v. Biltbest Products, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01503
Plaintiff:
Richard Henderson , Diane Linnenbringer , Louella Ponder and others
Defendant:
Biltbest Products, Inc. and Timothy D. Stokes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
